Our last two articles have shown that
"priesthood" is all-important to Mormons. Brigham
Young, the second Mormon Prophet described LDS
priesthood as "invisible, almighty God-like
power" (Journal of Discourses, vol. 3, p.
259). It certainly is invisible, but to say it is
an "almighty God-like" power is another matter.
Jesus showed "God-like" power in the
presence of both believers and unbelievers when He
instantly healed the sick, gave sight to the blind, and
raised Lazarus back to life when he had been dead for
four days. Do Mormons have that same "God-like" power?
People make all kinds of claims. The
question is, are they true? For example, I could claim
the Lord personally called and ordained me with
invisible "apostolic-power" which authorized me to
baptize and ordain others with the same
"apostolic-power" as well as to establish His true
church and do everything necessary to enter His eternal
kingdom. Since my "apostolic-power" is invisible, I
don’t have any real proof that I have it. Mormonism’s
invisible "priesthood power" has the same problem. It
lacks evidence to prove that it really exists.
All active LDS males over 12 years of age
are ordained to an office in the Aaronic or Melchizedek
Priesthood by someone who was ordained before them in
that priesthood and so on back to Joseph Smith or Oliver
Cowdery who were the first to receive it in the LDS
Church. Joseph and Oliver claim that they received the
Aaronic Priesthood from John the Baptist and later
received the Melchizedek Priesthood from Peter, James
and John who got it from Jesus Christ.
The restoration of the Aaronic Priesthood
is recorded in Mormon scripture in the Pearl of Great
Price, Joseph Smith History 1:68-75. It says that
while Smith was translating the gold plates of the
Book of Mormon in May 1829, he came across the
subject of baptism for the remission of sins and wanted
to understand it better. So, he and Oliver Cowdery went
into the woods to ask God about it.
While they were praying, John the Baptist
appeared and laid his hands on both of them and
conferred the Priesthood of Aaron upon them. John then
told Joseph to baptize Oliver and Oliver to baptize
Joseph. Then he told Joseph to ordain Oliver and Oliver
to ordain Joseph to the Aaronic Priesthood.
But there are problems with this story in
addition to the fact that John the Baptist was beheaded
before Christ was crucified. It does not follow the LDS
rules for how baptisms and ordinations are to be handled
in the LDS Church today even though Mormons often claim
that God always works the same way in His Church.
In this account Joseph and Oliver both
received the Aaronic Priesthood from John the Baptist
before they were baptized for the remission of their
sins, which would not be acceptable in the LDS Church
today. Joseph had not been baptized when he baptized
Oliver, which would also make Oliver’s baptism
unacceptable since LDS claim only those who have been
properly baptized and ordained can legitimately baptize
others.
If Oliver’s baptism was not valid by LDS
standards today he could not legitimately baptize
Joseph. But he baptized him anyway which would also
invalidate Joseph’s baptism. If Joseph was not properly
baptized when he ordained Oliver to the Aaronic
Priesthood then Oliver’s ordination would not be
acceptable either. And if Oliver was not properly
baptized and ordained when he ordained Joseph to the
Aaronic Priesthood, Joseph’s ordination would also be
invalid.
If Joseph and Oliver were ordained to the
Aaronic Priesthood by John the Baptist before they
baptized each other, why did they need to ordain each
other to the same priesthood again after they baptized
each other? Was the ordination of Joseph and Oliver by
John the Baptist washed away when they baptized each
other? Since Joseph and Oliver ordained each other to
the Aaronic Priesthood, their ordination by John the
Baptist seems to have been unnecessary and irrelevant.
The Melchizedek Priesthood is the most
important priesthood in Mormonism, yet the only
reference in LDS scripture to its restoration is in the
Pearl of Great Price, Joseph Smith-History 1:72.
But that text does not say exactly how or when Peter,
James and John "restored" it to Joseph and Oliver. It
also shows that Peter and James, who had been dead for
centuries, did as much as John even though John
supposedly has been alive doing the Lord’s work ever
since His first coming.
LDS scripture says John the Apostle as
well as three of the twelve apostles Jesus had in
America, never died and will remain on earth and
bring souls to Jesus until He returns (Doctrine
and Covenants, Sec. 7; The Book of Mormon
in III Nephi 28). Surely those apostles as well as their
converts must have that all-important priesthood that
LDS claim is necessary to baptize, ordain and so on.
If LDS scripture is true, there should
have been thousands of men with the priesthood on earth
at the same time Joseph Smith claimed he "restored" it,
which would make the restoration of it unnecessary! All
LDS priesthood comes from this confusing account given
by Joseph Smith in Mormon scripture.
Biblical Christians believe in the
priesthood of all believers and
reject the LDS claim that God only accepts baptisms,
ordinations, etc., performed by someone with invisible
LDS priesthood power.
Next time we will discuss some of the
biblical texts that LDS use to teach the necessity of
their priesthood. Those who want to read more about LDS
priesthood can do so in Gospel Doctrine by the 6